Other new features include an expanded ISO range of 100 to 50000, 16 minute maximum exposure time, dynamic range equivalent of 13.5 stops, an on-screen level gauge, and super quiet . One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. M-E "CCD" M9 M9-P CCD. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. Thank you for pointing me to that review. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. And sometimes they could come in handy. dslr . For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. That, in my opinion, is the Leica M 240's motto. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. Find out more about 35mmc here. By You can click any image for a larger view which is the best way to view it as this site compresses these down to what you see below . To make pictures, those are good bodies to be used with good lens. It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone. If zinc is your preference the M6 is your baby. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. However it is nice to have a brand new camera and if you can manage without Liveview most M262 users seem very happy with it. Size/weight is perfect . If tapping the top plate sounded a bit hollow: remember its aluminium not brass in the 262, Sure. I got the m262 because it has everything i need and nothing i do not need. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. As such, it felt like itd be the perfect camera for me. From what I understand the M10 has substantially improved this feature and this is an attractive change. A larger sensor will capture more light, which results in improved low-light performance, dynamic range, and general image quality. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . Expanded ISO allows you to go beyond the native ISO. I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. For system cameras, having a focus motor in the camera's body allows you to use a wide range of lenses, including lenses which do not have their own focus motor. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. Anyway, Im firmly off topic at this point, but almost two years on and I have no gripes at all with the M10. All images generated with the M262 + 24mm 3.8 were taken July 6 between 3 and 5 PM around Victoria, BC in direct overhead sunlight (far from ideal), https://www.dropbox.com/sh/borvrgwfsovpoiz/AADvQ-IsxTfl51btqaCD_i4Fa?dl=0. There are two things to be separated here. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . Interesting article as I picked up a used m240 at Christmas at a good price. I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. The upgrade to the M10 feels like its based on some fairly thin justifications, though I suspect (hope) that in practice just like swapping from M9 to M262 I will be pleasantly surprised by the fact that I find it brings more to the table than I expected. Finally, a digital camera that truly feels like a good old analog Leica. homestead high school staff. This thing has live-view, and video. I think I am veering towards the M262 with the Voigtlander Ultron35mm. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. My primary reasons for upgrading were: better high ISO capabilities ie. They didn't say it's a different sensor, they said different technology. You cannot paste images directly. As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. This has all the advantages of shooting raw, while taking up much less storage space. You and Roger Hicks. I sometimes shot movies and it was amazing. High quality battery charger is a handy companion for digital shooting. Hello Hamish,Great writeup. I shot film forever and my M2 was my first range finder. - 35mmc, https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party, Nikon 28ti and 35ti - Mini-Review - By Ahmed Al Shorouqi, 5 frames with the Nikon FM2 & Agfa APX 400 in my Paris - By Martina Rigotti, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. In case you're confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. I just recently bought a Leica M262, interestingly I read your blog and it actually helped encourage me to buy it. There is still some faint banding, but a huge improvement over the M240. Additionally, I really like the simplified look and small upgrades the MP versions offer. I love using that camera but want a digitals instant gratification and ease of image development (Im lazy). My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. Mostly because of the need for a screen that I allude to. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. It depends on your needs. To me this seems like a hassle. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. It uses a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor with a near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? Id mounted the lens to my M262 and was pondering how I was going to get used to shooting a 35mm lens again in such a short period []. This is a useful feature for me that I enjoyed using the Fuji system which had a great focus peaking aid. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. Selling the M262, a camera that I purchased for its pure simplicity; and keeping the Z6, a camera that I purchased for its many features (including live view, a hybrid camera with fantastic video capabilities including full frame 4K, compatibility with my Profoto strobes, owning quite a bit of Nikon F-mount glass, auto-focus, etc.)! The SET and the ISO buttons are much more useful though to be honest, I personally dont even use the stuff in the set menu either. I know youre right, I often talk about the bullshit involved in the upgrade path but it has an iso dial! The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. Theres been a couple of times when Ive picked the camera up one after using it in lower light and ended up shooting a whole loads of frames at a high ISO before twigging that the chosen shutter speed seems too high. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. The Leica M10 's physical controls are logical, simple, and offer the right amount of resistance. We have the top best product and truth reviews that will help make your decision easy. Functionalism be damned. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. He mentioned that he drives older vehicles in order to be able to afford just the kit he wants.Agreed with John Smith. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. Ive had it for years and purchased it when M8s were at their lowest prices. Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water. You can post now and register later. If you want video and live view, get the 240. You cannot paste images directly. The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. To each his own, indeed!Ive never seen one in real life mad to think Ive ordered a camera of that value without handling it. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. The LEICA M typ 240 offers a much quieter shutter than the M9, as well as LEICA's first option for an external electronic viewfinder (EVF), the . "It has the same image quality as the Leica M 240" was the . As is the image quality of the M10. It tells you : take your time, have fun with the manual focus, enjoy the concepts small is beautiful and less is more, listen to the music made by the shutter, look how discret you are when shooting and readily agreed, leave the arm race to the geek and feel free to take pictures your way.Shooting with the M262 is as simple and as pleasant as a walk in the forest in summer. Yes!! Personally, I tire of the constant whining about Leica prices. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! The type of viewfinder that the camera has. The focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. Itd be a waste of time when you can go and find other reviews that no doubt do high ISO comparisons with other brands of cameras etc. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. To a degree, I can see their point too. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. The better screen, slightly improved interface and even fairly small things like the artificially lit frame lines introduced in the M240 made the the camera feel more mature. Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more space. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. This is the reason I was so keen not to be without one for a few months so when the M240 didnt initially seem all that different to the M262 I was really pleased!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_12',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); This relief quickly turned to intrigue. On the M240 the highlight from focus peaking is often not apparent at all. When I was looking at replacing my M9 with a newer model which I did in large part for the benefit of a better screen on the back I chose to skip the Leica M240 due to the fact that I didnt feel like the swathe of features it had compared to the later M262 offered me any advantage. I like Roger a lot hes written for this site before, and we chatted a fair bit around the time. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. It does make me wonder if they could have slimmed down this body like the M10, were they to have released this camera as a major upgrade rather than a stripped-back sidestep from the M240. Read full post here: All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Help us by suggesting a value. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. Reduction of features is something no other brand of cameras shouts about, ever. My guess is that many of the Leica purists won't be bothered at all by this decision. All other things aside, they, Leica M cameras, are unique. . Ultra-niche appeal. I find it to be a useful feature at times. Its marquee features are omissions rather than additions: the M-D doesn't . You have to ask yourself, . I have a Fuji X100f and stripped down the OVF/EVF data and shoot in manual with manual focus only to give it a M2 feel. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. I missed his musings in AP. Great review as always, I look forward to the M10 review I think the slimmer body size alone is a reason to upgrade, feel like a proper M body. Use your experience to help others in the community make a decision. I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. Hi everyone. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. This includes the M10-R, M10-P, M10 Monochrom, M10, and M10-D from the current generation, as well as the M (Typ 240), M-P (Typ 240), M (Typ 262), M-D (Typ 262) and the M Monochrom (Typ 246) from the prior generation. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? It serves specific duty now, monochrome and infrared imaging only. Without a magnifier piececomfortable view is 50-35mm. Though I prefer using Rolleiflex and an old M4 for my creative projects. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. That said, I dont shoot Leicas for rapidity.Start Up. Congratulations on your decision. Can you advice,please, if you still own both cameras: why some people says that m262 perform better colors? All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Youve often been a voice of reason in my ear on this website, John. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. Shooting with the Leica M262 in manual ISO takes 3 commands to change and set the ISO. Of course they can, but you have them. All of a sudden, the M10 held a lot of appeal. The ideas with Leica is identities. Great pictures and very interesting. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. Thanks for the insights Louis! Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. Nice review.I bought a m262 this year when one of my pensions surprisingly came out.I wanted1] a digital leica m2] no video3] no live view4] no EVFBut i like to sometimes review a pic when i am out and about.The 262 is perfect for me and i love it.with the m-e 240 being announced i have noticed that used 262 cameras have already dropped in price so its possible i can buy a dream 2nd body.Meaning another 262. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. Either way, its the M262 that I want to keepif(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_18',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Though I must admit, this experience has had me thinking that an M10 would be better suited to me now. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! I upgraded to the M240 from an M9, had it for 3 months and went back to an M9. Pasted as rich text. Here are my thoughts on the M240 alongside my second hand and limited knowledge of the M10. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. Why torture yourself? BudfoxJuly 7, 2016 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). Let's try another side by side Leica Monochrom - 50 Lux - click for larger and crop - Leica M 240 - click for larger. Menu. I bought it as temporary replacement camera after my M262 had to pay a little trip to Germany for some repair work. The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. Paste as plain text instead, It was at this early stage that I noticed the first thing that has continued to make me scratch my head throughout the time I used the camera. I upgraded from the M9 on single basis that I wanted a camera with a better screen. This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! Upload or insert images from URL. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. Your previous content has been restored. This really piqued my interest. has a removable battery. I currently have a q which is a lot of fun but I'm more interested in a rangefinder at this point. I am aware many own the Monochrom and love it to death. Funny thing that while the M10 launched, I ordered one early 2017 thinking this may be the M I waited for. Of all the mentioned digital rangefinders, I enjoyed the [], [] is a definite yes! The image on the back screen of the Leica M240 is very cool toned and unsaturated. ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). And if you are not interested in movies or EVF, as a.Noctilux said, you can ignore them. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. Source: DxOMark. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. Same lens, same settings - desaturated during RAW conversion. Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. It might be a step backwards in volume of features, but it was a step in the right direction in terms what I think a Leica camera should stand for. My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). How important do you think live view will be for you? Shedding some light on the sources of noise, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2022, Leica adds 12-bit Cinema 4K Raw video output, improved AF features and more to its SL2-S, A closer look at the Leica M11 (photo gallery), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. Learn how your comment data is processed. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. This friendly dig on Facebook from Alex Hakimi somewhat sums up how ridiculous all this really is: if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); Anyway, the point is, at one stage, not all that long ago, I was very happy with the M262 and didnt really feel like the M10 could possibly bring any advantages to me. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. Without looking, apart from the lens detection options, I couldnt tell you whats in the menu at all. Clear editor. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. - and the M240 in color. People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. A M262 is a friendly camera. Leica M Typ 240. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. Then out of curiosity, I've bough at fair price ( sh price dropped when M10 came, I couldn't resist) former digital Ms (M240, M-D, M246). So, the obvious question: why not the M10-D? Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. I have one for the M240 and dont use it that much but at times it helps with critical focus. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. In fact, I pressed the LV (for live-view) button on the camera before I even took a photo. Unsurprisingly, the camera never really made a breakthrough in the video world so perhaps Leica decided it wasn't worth keeping it. The body is pretty well weather sealed. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didn't need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. The price is$5195/4050. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. The combination of the live view and the advantages I had begun to feel a physical ISO dial could bring to the table were then enough to have me wondering how much of my kit Id have to sell to change up to the M10.
Uranus And Neptune In Vedic Astrology, Robert Palmer Funeral, Jennifer K Company Jewelry, Articles L